<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The Archbishop has made a big, bad blunder&#8230;&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://orthodoxhistory.org/2009/09/03/the-archbishop-has-made-a-big-bad-blunder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://orthodoxhistory.org/2009/09/03/the-archbishop-has-made-a-big-bad-blunder/</link>
	<description>The Society for Orthodox Christian History in the Americas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 13:30:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: OrthodoxHistory.org » Blog Archive &#187; Irvine&#8217;s ordination: another Episcopalian perspective</title>
		<link>http://orthodoxhistory.org/2009/09/03/the-archbishop-has-made-a-big-bad-blunder/comment-page-1/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>OrthodoxHistory.org » Blog Archive &#187; Irvine&#8217;s ordination: another Episcopalian perspective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orthodoxhistory.org/?p=799#comment-336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] friend of Irvine, provides a perspective on Irvine&#8217;s ordination that differs markedly from the negative reaction of Bishop Grafton. I&#8217;m reprinting Odell&#8217;s preface in its entirety: In view of the assembling of a council [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] friend of Irvine, provides a perspective on Irvine&#8217;s ordination that differs markedly from the negative reaction of Bishop Grafton. I&#8217;m reprinting Odell&#8217;s preface in its entirety: In view of the assembling of a council [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Hayward</title>
		<link>http://orthodoxhistory.org/2009/09/03/the-archbishop-has-made-a-big-bad-blunder/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Hayward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orthodoxhistory.org/?p=799#comment-218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps Anglican &quot;branch theory&quot; that there are three branches of the Church, namely Orthodox, Catholic, and Anglican, may seem stranger than Rome&#039;s way of approaching reconciliation, but one of the things I pointed out in &lt;a href=&quot;http://JonathansCorner.com/ecumenism/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;An open letter to Catholics on Orthodoxy and ecumenism&lt;/a&gt; is that for all their efforts at reconciliation, I have never once heard a Catholic who was reaching out even acknowledge Orthodox concerns about recantation of Western heresy as a basis for any proper reunification.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Anglican &#8220;branch theory&#8221; that there are three branches of the Church, namely Orthodox, Catholic, and Anglican, may seem stranger than Rome&#8217;s way of approaching reconciliation, but one of the things I pointed out in <a href="http://JonathansCorner.com/ecumenism/" rel="nofollow">An open letter to Catholics on Orthodoxy and ecumenism</a> is that for all their efforts at reconciliation, I have never once heard a Catholic who was reaching out even acknowledge Orthodox concerns about recantation of Western heresy as a basis for any proper reunification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
