<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: St. John comes to Chicago, 1895</title>
	<atom:link href="http://orthodoxhistory.org/2009/11/02/st-john-comes-to-chicago-1895/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://orthodoxhistory.org/2009/11/02/st-john-comes-to-chicago-1895/</link>
	<description>The Society for Orthodox Christian History in the Americas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 13:30:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isa Almisry</title>
		<link>http://orthodoxhistory.org/2009/11/02/st-john-comes-to-chicago-1895/comment-page-1/#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>Isa Almisry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 03:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orthodoxhistory.org/?p=1177#comment-988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[just came across a little something: NY Times, Dec. 8, 1895
 
A Grand Cathedral Shrinks

SAN FRANCISCO, Dec. 7-Bishop Nicholas says that hte story telegraphed from Chicago that the Holy Synod has directed him to build a $500,000 cathedral at Chicago is incorrect.  He has authorized the priests in Chicago to build a church there, but the price will be nearer $5,000 than $500,000.
http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9D0CE2DD1E3DE433A2575BC0A9649D94649ED7CFhttp://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9D0CE2DD1E3DE433A2575BC0A9649D94649ED7CF&amp;scp=3208&amp;sq=Russian+Church&amp;st=p
That&#039;s $150,000 versus $15,350,000 in 2010 $$$]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just came across a little something: NY Times, Dec. 8, 1895</p>
<p>A Grand Cathedral Shrinks</p>
<p>SAN FRANCISCO, Dec. 7-Bishop Nicholas says that hte story telegraphed from Chicago that the Holy Synod has directed him to build a $500,000 cathedral at Chicago is incorrect.  He has authorized the priests in Chicago to build a church there, but the price will be nearer $5,000 than $500,000.<br />
<a href="http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9D0CE2DD1E3DE433A2575BC0A9649D94649ED7CFhttp://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9D0CE2DD1E3DE433A2575BC0A9649D94649ED7CF&#038;scp=3208&#038;sq=Russian+Church&#038;st=p" rel="nofollow">http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9D0CE2DD1E3DE433A2575BC0A9649D94649ED7CFhttp://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9D0CE2DD1E3DE433A2575BC0A9649D94649ED7CF&#038;scp=3208&#038;sq=Russian+Church&#038;st=p</a><br />
That&#8217;s $150,000 versus $15,350,000 in 2010 $$$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OrthodoxHistory.org » Blog Archive &#187; The controversial Fr. Basil Bouroff</title>
		<link>http://orthodoxhistory.org/2009/11/02/st-john-comes-to-chicago-1895/comment-page-1/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>OrthodoxHistory.org » Blog Archive &#187; The controversial Fr. Basil Bouroff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orthodoxhistory.org/?p=1177#comment-276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I wrote about St. John Kochurov&#8217;s arrival in Chicago, which followed on the heels of Fr. B.A. Bouroff&#8217;s expulsion by Bishop Nicholas, on the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote about St. John Kochurov&#8217;s arrival in Chicago, which followed on the heels of Fr. B.A. Bouroff&#8217;s expulsion by Bishop Nicholas, on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isa Almisry</title>
		<link>http://orthodoxhistory.org/2009/11/02/st-john-comes-to-chicago-1895/comment-page-1/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Isa Almisry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 01:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orthodoxhistory.org/?p=1177#comment-275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In any event, the most interesting part of this story is the Fr. Bouroff, who was apparently removed from his post for daring to attend the University of Chicago. I know some of our readers here have connections to that institution; perhaps there is something in the school’s archives which could shed more light on this episode?&quot;

Unfortunately I won&#039;t have the opportunity to go myself to the alma mater, but I know some parisioners in the area.

For one thing, it could be the school&#039;s Protestant connections: the Old University of Chicago had been founded as a Baptist College by Stephan A. Douglas. He had offered its facilities to the Presbyterian Church, but the Baptist were the ones who managed to raise the funds, and its board&#039;s rules required a Baptist majority.  Rockfeller, a Baptist, incorporated the new (present) University as a secular school, but the co-founder, William Rainey Harper, was another Baptist whose field was OT, in particular Hebrew studies.  In 1895 the University was less than 4 years old, and had the Old University had failed less than a decade before.  Given the prior failure and the Protestant connections, and how Fr. Bjerring ended, it could have been more of a gamble than Bishop Nicolai was willing to tolerate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In any event, the most interesting part of this story is the Fr. Bouroff, who was apparently removed from his post for daring to attend the University of Chicago. I know some of our readers here have connections to that institution; perhaps there is something in the school’s archives which could shed more light on this episode?&#8221;</p>
<p>Unfortunately I won&#8217;t have the opportunity to go myself to the alma mater, but I know some parisioners in the area.</p>
<p>For one thing, it could be the school&#8217;s Protestant connections: the Old University of Chicago had been founded as a Baptist College by Stephan A. Douglas. He had offered its facilities to the Presbyterian Church, but the Baptist were the ones who managed to raise the funds, and its board&#8217;s rules required a Baptist majority.  Rockfeller, a Baptist, incorporated the new (present) University as a secular school, but the co-founder, William Rainey Harper, was another Baptist whose field was OT, in particular Hebrew studies.  In 1895 the University was less than 4 years old, and had the Old University had failed less than a decade before.  Given the prior failure and the Protestant connections, and how Fr. Bjerring ended, it could have been more of a gamble than Bishop Nicolai was willing to tolerate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
