3 comments so far
Editor’s note: We are once again privileged to present the work of the remarkable Nicholas Chapman. Several months ago, we published two articles by Nicholas on the presence of Orthodoxy in Colonial Virginia (to read those, click here and here). Today, Nicholas introduces us to some of his most recent discoveries. On the next three Tuesdays, we’ll publish the three documents Nicholas discusses below.
At the end of July this year I was able to spend an afternoon at the National Archives in London, UK. I was aware that certain documents pertaining to the history of the Russian Orthodox Community in London were held there and I was hoping to find more information with regard to the early presence of Orthodoxy in British America before the American Revolution. Whilst my original goal was achieved I also discovered a wealth of other documents relating to the history of Orthodoxy in America between 1865 -1945. There is much more to translate and to write. I am grateful to Matushka Marie Meyendorff for her initial draft translation of the documents that follow. Not every part is immediately readable, but God willing a more complete and refined translation can be made in due course.
Agapius Honcharenko in his later years
It would perhaps be helpful to briefly set a little historical background. There are three documents collectively filed under the heading of “The Russian Orthodox Church in America and Its Clergy 1865” They consist of a covering letter written by the venerable and very elderly Metropolitan Filaret of Moscow to the “Ober Procurator” of the Holy Synod of Russia – effectively the Minister of Religion. The Metropolitan encloses two further documents: a detailed and generally negative overview of the case against Agapius Honcharenko with an explanation as to why he was defrocked as a deacon by the Russian Synod in 1861. The second is a letter to an unknown priest (most likely the Rev. Eugene Popov the Russian Orthodox priest in London) from Agapius Honcharenko pleading his side of the story and essentially petitioning to be taken back by the Russian Church. Since his defrocking as a deacon, he appears to have been made a priest, either by the Church of Constantinople or the Church of Greece.
It is interesting that Metropolitan Filaret does not simply dismiss Honcharenko’s claims but appears to treat them seriously enough to suggest to the Ober-Procurator that they provide sufficient grounds to lead the Russian Church to establish a full ecclesial presence in the United States. It should be remembered that these documents predate the US purchase of Alaska from the Russian Empire in March 1867. It should also be noted that the American Civil War was still underway when these documents were written and that the Russian Empire was an active supporter of the Northern States during the conflict. Many in fact credit Metropolitan Filaret as being one of the driving forces behind the abolition of serfdom in Russian Empire (1861) and Agapius Honcharenko was also known as an advocate of that cause. This may partly explain Filaret’s somewhat sympathetic stance to his case.
The reference of Filaret to “American spiritual leaders” in California is also of interest and is most probably related to the overtures being made at that time by leaders of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the USA to the Russian Orthodox Church and efforts which had already begun toward the formation of a Russian Orthodox Parish in San Francisco.
Nicholas Chapman, Herkimer, New York, August 21 2010
Share and Enjoy
Tags: 1865, Agapius Honcharenko, America, England, Philaret Drozdov, primary sources, Russian
Copyright © 2010 by Nicholas Chapman. All rights reserved. Your use of this article is subject to our Terms of Use.
Copyright Notice
Podcast
- The Homilies of St. Raphael Hawaweeny
- St. Tikhon, Enlightener of America
- Orthodoxy: Yesterday and Today
- Bishop Basil and the Episcopal Assembly
- Our Best Chance Yet
- The Stormy Petrel of the Cloth
- Isabel Hapgood
- Metropolitan Antony Bashir
- Bishop Nestor Dies at Sea
- The Mysterious Death of Fr. Paul Kedrolivansky
Popular Posts
- The First Black Orthodox Priest in America
- Orthodoxy in Colonial Virginia
- Orthodoxy in Colonial Virginia (Part 2)
- 30 Year Anniversary of Bob Marley's Death
- Source of the Week: Bob Marley's funeral program
- Icons Are Not "Written"
- Impressions from the Episcopal Assembly
- Further impressions from the Episcopal Assembly
- 2010 Census of Orthodox Christian Churches in the USA
- Organs in Greek Orthodox churches
Recent Comments
- gsarraf: I just read this post (and comments 1-6) and must say you all make some great points here. The work of your...
- VovaHindrichs: Then again, there is still the apparent odd-ball in that none of the sponsors are, at least prima...
- VovaHindrichs: Sorry Nicholas, I must have missed the fact that the service was chanted in Slavonic, but that would...
- Nicholas Chapman: Thanks for the kind words. I don’t really see any evidence in Adam’s diary to suggest...
- Fr. Oliver Herbel: Fair enough. Yes, one can be significant in terms of the impact made and one can be significant in...
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
[...] note: Last week, Nicholas Chapman introduced three documents he found in the National Archives in London, under the heading “The Russian Orthodox Church [...]
[...] of three historical documents recently discovered by Nicholas Chapman. On August 24, we published Nicholas’ introduction to the documents, and last week, we published a letter by St. Philaret of Moscow on the subject of [...]
[...] Nicholas’ introduction to the documents [...]