<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bishop Nicholas in Galveston, 1896</title>
	<atom:link href="http://orthodoxhistory.org/2010/11/29/bishop-nicholas-in-galveston-1896/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://orthodoxhistory.org/2010/11/29/bishop-nicholas-in-galveston-1896/</link>
	<description>The Society for Orthodox Christian History in the Americas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 13:30:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isa Almisry</title>
		<link>http://orthodoxhistory.org/2010/11/29/bishop-nicholas-in-galveston-1896/comment-page-1/#comment-1392</link>
		<dc:creator>Isa Almisry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 01:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orthodoxhistory.org/?p=3439#comment-1392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;It’s not known whether Bishop Nicholas visited the Orthodox church in New Orleans when he passed through the city. There is no evidence that the parish was a part of his diocese, but given Bishop Nicholas’ own view that he had jurisdiction over the entire Western Hemisphere, he may well have considered the New Orleans parish to be under his authority. It would be very interesting to know what, if any, contacts the New Orleans Orthodox community had with the Russian bishop.&quot;

I just came across an interesting tid bit on this issue:
&quot;Some of the sacred vestments and vessels, which remain in use until today, were made for ths church [Holy Trinity New Orleans]  during the year 1886, by the then Emperor of Russia, at the request of the Russian bishop in America who visited the church spoken about during the said year 1886 .&quot;

Conoutas, who seems (or his sources) to have conflated a few things, is writiing as a Greek, in Greek, for Greeks.  Given this context, it is interesting that he reports an attempt of the &quot;Russian Bishop&quot; to exercise solicitude over the Church in New Olreans.  It is odd that he folows up with this &quot;The first priest of the Church spoken of is supposed to have been one belonging to the Russian Mission in America. But his name today no one thinks of, nor is it found in the minutes of the council of Church.&quot;

That would be, of course, Honcharenko. Conoutas footnotes this remark with &quot;So writes us a good expatriate on the spot k. N. Bellamore, who served for years and continuing as chairman of the board of the trustees of the Church.&quot;

&quot;Hellenism in America&quot;
http://books.google.com/books?id=Cm_XAAAAMAAJ&amp;pg=PA161&amp;lpg=PA161&amp;dq=%CE%B2%CE%B1%CE%BC%CE%B2%CE%B1%CE%BA%CE%B5%CE%BC%CF%80%CF%8C%CF%81%CF%89%CE%BD&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=RO1rZWZSan&amp;sig=G7mfsXtBOWvvGFORflBOSuCSDeg&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=3TiRTeN6yJrRAf2gsM8O&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=1&amp;ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&amp;q=%CE%B2%CE%B1%CE%BC%CE%B2%CE%B1%CE%BA%CE%B5%CE%BC%CF%80%CF%8C%CF%81%CF%89%CE%BD&amp;f=false]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s not known whether Bishop Nicholas visited the Orthodox church in New Orleans when he passed through the city. There is no evidence that the parish was a part of his diocese, but given Bishop Nicholas’ own view that he had jurisdiction over the entire Western Hemisphere, he may well have considered the New Orleans parish to be under his authority. It would be very interesting to know what, if any, contacts the New Orleans Orthodox community had with the Russian bishop.&#8221;</p>
<p>I just came across an interesting tid bit on this issue:<br />
&#8220;Some of the sacred vestments and vessels, which remain in use until today, were made for ths church [Holy Trinity New Orleans]  during the year 1886, by the then Emperor of Russia, at the request of the Russian bishop in America who visited the church spoken about during the said year 1886 .&#8221;</p>
<p>Conoutas, who seems (or his sources) to have conflated a few things, is writiing as a Greek, in Greek, for Greeks.  Given this context, it is interesting that he reports an attempt of the &#8220;Russian Bishop&#8221; to exercise solicitude over the Church in New Olreans.  It is odd that he folows up with this &#8220;The first priest of the Church spoken of is supposed to have been one belonging to the Russian Mission in America. But his name today no one thinks of, nor is it found in the minutes of the council of Church.&#8221;</p>
<p>That would be, of course, Honcharenko. Conoutas footnotes this remark with &#8220;So writes us a good expatriate on the spot k. N. Bellamore, who served for years and continuing as chairman of the board of the trustees of the Church.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Hellenism in America&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=Cm_XAAAAMAAJ&#038;pg=PA161&#038;lpg=PA161&#038;dq=%CE%B2%CE%B1%CE%BC%CE%B2%CE%B1%CE%BA%CE%B5%CE%BC%CF%80%CF%8C%CF%81%CF%89%CE%BD&#038;source=bl&#038;ots=RO1rZWZSan&#038;sig=G7mfsXtBOWvvGFORflBOSuCSDeg&#038;hl=en&#038;ei=3TiRTeN6yJrRAf2gsM8O&#038;sa=X&#038;oi=book_result&#038;ct=result&#038;resnum=1&#038;ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&#038;q=%CE%B2%CE%B1%CE%BC%CE%B2%CE%B1%CE%BA%CE%B5%CE%BC%CF%80%CF%8C%CF%81%CF%89%CE%BD&#038;f=false" rel="nofollow">http://books.google.com/books?id=Cm_XAAAAMAAJ&#038;pg=PA161&#038;lpg=PA161&#038;dq=%CE%B2%CE%B1%CE%BC%CE%B2%CE%B1%CE%BA%CE%B5%CE%BC%CF%80%CF%8C%CF%81%CF%89%CE%BD&#038;source=bl&#038;ots=RO1rZWZSan&#038;sig=G7mfsXtBOWvvGFORflBOSuCSDeg&#038;hl=en&#038;ei=3TiRTeN6yJrRAf2gsM8O&#038;sa=X&#038;oi=book_result&#038;ct=result&#038;resnum=1&#038;ved=0CBgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&#038;q=%CE%B2%CE%B1%CE%BC%CE%B2%CE%B1%CE%BA%CE%B5%CE%BC%CF%80%CF%8C%CF%81%CF%89%CE%BD&#038;f=false</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
