<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On blogging history: a response to some critics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://orthodoxhistory.org/2011/03/24/on-blogging-history-a-response-to-some-critics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://orthodoxhistory.org/2011/03/24/on-blogging-history-a-response-to-some-critics/</link>
	<description>The Society for Orthodox Christian History in the Americas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fr. Oliver Herbel</title>
		<link>http://orthodoxhistory.org/2011/03/24/on-blogging-history-a-response-to-some-critics/comment-page-1/#comment-1419</link>
		<dc:creator>Fr. Oliver Herbel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 02:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orthodoxhistory.org/?p=4353#comment-1419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[:-D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://orthodoxhistory.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam DeVille</title>
		<link>http://orthodoxhistory.org/2011/03/24/on-blogging-history-a-response-to-some-critics/comment-page-1/#comment-1418</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam DeVille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 01:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orthodoxhistory.org/?p=4353#comment-1418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you should simply present yourself as French and be able to get away with these types of &#039;unfinished&#039; pieces (&quot;Namee&quot; already sounds vaguely French--just put an egout accent on the first &#039;e&#039; and you&#039;re set!.  I have in mind a comment the great Byzantine liturgical historian Robert Taft makes (in, I think, his book *Beyond East and West: Problems in Liturgical Understanding*) where he says : “with admirable boldness Francophone authors will throw into the agora an inchoative theory to be gnawed on by the critics before retrieving what remains and polishing it up for a second edition. They cover their flank by calling their sallies esquisses, jalons, essais.”]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you should simply present yourself as French and be able to get away with these types of &#8216;unfinished&#8217; pieces (&#8220;Namee&#8221; already sounds vaguely French&#8211;just put an egout accent on the first &#8216;e&#8217; and you&#8217;re set!.  I have in mind a comment the great Byzantine liturgical historian Robert Taft makes (in, I think, his book *Beyond East and West: Problems in Liturgical Understanding*) where he says : “with admirable boldness Francophone authors will throw into the agora an inchoative theory to be gnawed on by the critics before retrieving what remains and polishing it up for a second edition. They cover their flank by calling their sallies esquisses, jalons, essais.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JTeusink</title>
		<link>http://orthodoxhistory.org/2011/03/24/on-blogging-history-a-response-to-some-critics/comment-page-1/#comment-1383</link>
		<dc:creator>JTeusink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orthodoxhistory.org/?p=4353#comment-1383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sorry you get such huge overreactions to your article :-/. There seems to be a lot of passion involved in recent Ukrainian Orthodox history, which might explain why there have been so many different Ukrainian Orthodox jurisdictions since the Revolution :-).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry you get such huge overreactions to your article :-/. There seems to be a lot of passion involved in recent Ukrainian Orthodox history, which might explain why there have been so many different Ukrainian Orthodox jurisdictions since the Revolution <img src='http://orthodoxhistory.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isa Almisry</title>
		<link>http://orthodoxhistory.org/2011/03/24/on-blogging-history-a-response-to-some-critics/comment-page-1/#comment-1379</link>
		<dc:creator>Isa Almisry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orthodoxhistory.org/?p=4353#comment-1379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rather than saying your are wrong, perhaps your critics would do more to the memory of Bp. Zuk by proving your wrong, with sources, article contributions, additional material etc. You just brought the tip into sight: they are free to uncover the iceberg.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather than saying your are wrong, perhaps your critics would do more to the memory of Bp. Zuk by proving your wrong, with sources, article contributions, additional material etc. You just brought the tip into sight: they are free to uncover the iceberg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orrologion</title>
		<link>http://orthodoxhistory.org/2011/03/24/on-blogging-history-a-response-to-some-critics/comment-page-1/#comment-1377</link>
		<dc:creator>orrologion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orthodoxhistory.org/?p=4353#comment-1377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read those comments and thought them unnecessarily harsh given the caveat you began your post with.  I look forward to any additional information they can provide on a figure who seems extremely interesting in the history of Orthodoxy in North America.

Having converted from a small religious denomination, I have noticed a defensiveness regarding history and doctrine that sometimes forgets how &#039;invisible&#039; such small groups are to the wider public - even to those with interests that would make them &#039;more likely&#039; to have some familiarity.  For instance, the average historian of religion in America may have heard of the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS), but they are unlikely to have at their fingertips much in the way of specifics regarding its history and its relations to the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod, for instance.  I think much the same can be said of American Orthodox history, in general, and that much more for the smaller, non-Greek, non-Russian jurisdictions.  Ukrainian Orthodox ecclesiological history seems to be that much more complex.

Rather than armchair criticism, I would much rather have seen positive suggestions for further resources and corrections of the sources you utilized.  I think you did a good job of positively responding to the undue criticism you received.   I hope they offer more on Ukrainian Orthodox history in America.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read those comments and thought them unnecessarily harsh given the caveat you began your post with.  I look forward to any additional information they can provide on a figure who seems extremely interesting in the history of Orthodoxy in North America.</p>
<p>Having converted from a small religious denomination, I have noticed a defensiveness regarding history and doctrine that sometimes forgets how &#8216;invisible&#8217; such small groups are to the wider public &#8211; even to those with interests that would make them &#8216;more likely&#8217; to have some familiarity.  For instance, the average historian of religion in America may have heard of the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod (WELS), but they are unlikely to have at their fingertips much in the way of specifics regarding its history and its relations to the Lutheran Church &#8211; Missouri Synod, for instance.  I think much the same can be said of American Orthodox history, in general, and that much more for the smaller, non-Greek, non-Russian jurisdictions.  Ukrainian Orthodox ecclesiological history seems to be that much more complex.</p>
<p>Rather than armchair criticism, I would much rather have seen positive suggestions for further resources and corrections of the sources you utilized.  I think you did a good job of positively responding to the undue criticism you received.   I hope they offer more on Ukrainian Orthodox history in America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
